Tuesday, 13 March 2012

Is Nuclear really CO2 Free?

These diagrams show, carbon dioxide emissions in Japan are increasing despite more and more nuclear energy being generated (54 reactors in last 45 years).  Also they show that co2 emission decreased in Germany, Denmark, and Sweden.  Those countries have been developing technologies of alternative energy without relying on building new nuclear power stations for global warming issue.


http://www.47news.jp/47topics/e/218274.php

Natural uranium contains only 0.7% of Uranium 235which is used as a nuclear power fuel, so it has to go through a long process of mining, refining, transporting, concentrating, and making it into pellets.  Storing and keeping the spent fuel rods  cool for so many years , and using very large thick concrete walls for building the nuclear power stations – all of these processes rely on other energy sources unless there is another nuclear power station nearby (and there usually isn’t.).   Strictly speaking it doesn’t produce CO2 only when electricity is generated. No country has yet developed an effective way of dealing with nuclear waste.  Japan has the best gas turbine  technology  (using methane=city gas as fuel so it doesn’t produce much CO2) in the world. 
Before the Fukushima disasternuclear power produced 25% of Japan’s electricity.  While nuclear was being used, half of the thermal power stations were
closed.  At the moment they are going to rely on gas or oil powered thermal power stations for a while.    I think that using more gas turbine systems to keep CO2 emissions low could buy some time to develop alternative ways of generating electricity, for example using geothermal energy sources.  There are so many hot springs places throughout Japan.
(Mia June)
Reference:
Lies of Nuclear Power by Mr. Hiroaki Koide

No comments:

Post a Comment