Posted
by Ian
Thomas Ash
Can you keep a secret?
15/11/13
The Japanese government’s
recent proposal of the “Designated Secrets Bill”, under which
journalists could face arrest and prosecution for divulging state
secrets, has been cause for much concern among many of my colleagues.
In
response to the bill, which is now under consideration by the
Japanese Diet, the Foreign Correspondent’s Club of Japan (FCCJ)
president Lucy Birmingham wrote a statement of protest:
It
is at the very heart of investigative journalism in open societies to
uncover secrets and to inform the people about the activities of
government. Such journalism is not a crime, but rather a crucial part
of the checks and balances that go hand in hand with democracy.
The
"Designated Secrets Bill" specifically warns journalists
that they must not engage in "inappropriate methods" in
conducting investigations of government policy. This appears to be a
direct threat aimed at the media profession and is unacceptably open
to wide interpretations in individual cases. Such vague language
could be, in effect, a license for government officials to prosecute
journalists almost as they please.
Yesterday, I attended a press
conference at the FCCJ during which several prominent politicians
voiced their opposition to the proposed “Designated Secrets Bill”
(press release HERE).
When
Social Democratic Party member Mizuho Fukushima asked lawmakers in
the ruling party to explain the definition of “secret”, the reply
she received alarmed her. “What is considered secret,” she
was told, “is secret”.
“But
information,” Fukushima insisted to the crowd of journalists
attending the press conference, “is the currency of democracy.”
Mr
Sohei Nihi, of the Japanese Communist Party, expressed his concern
that people could be arrested and prosecuted for revealing something
they did not realize was considered a state secret. He
suggested that with such vague wording in the bill regarding what is
considered a secret, the government could use it to control
information it deemed to be unflattering.
When
expressing his concern about the bill, Mr. Ryo Shuhama of the
People’s Life Party suggested that if the government yields too
much discretionary power then there is the danger that human rights
may be violated.
However, it was
perhaps the youngest and newest politician in attendance, Independent lawmaker
Taro Yamamoto, whose words were most anticipated.
Yamamoto wondered
why a bill such as this is even necessary when information that the public has
a right to know is already being tightly controlled. As an example, he explained that he recently discovered
that equivalent of nearly 2.5 million USD of public money that had been earmarked
for reconstruction efforts after the March 11, 2011, disaster was used for
“exploratory research” into how to promote the sale of Japan’s nuclear technology to
Vietnam. In the public’s interest,
Yamamoto requested the relevant papers which he brought to the press conference. The files were redacted to the point
that they were nearly entirely black (PHOTO below).
“Why is the government insisting on expanding its power to crack down?”
he asked. “On the surface, they
are saying this is about national security (relating to tensions in Asia), but
in reality this is going to lead to the oppression of rights and the freedom of
expression.”
Almost seeming to
directly address the camera crews from all the major networks that were filming
the press conference, Yamamoto expressed his disbelief at the lack of media
coverage the proposed bill has received despite his traveling up and down
the country from Hokkaido to Okinawa to speak out against it. “By not providing coverage of this
bill,” Yamamoto said, “the media is putting a noose around its own neck.”
“(The passing of
this bill) will lead to the ability for the government to crackdown on
anything”, Yamamoto predicted. “We
are on a path to recreating a fascist state.”
No comments:
Post a Comment