“…Placing the actual national numbers gleaned from the vaccine/miscarriage study of 2009 against the Watford Hospital, the national figures for pollutant caused miscarriage might be in the tens of thousands, at the very least, if you looked at these figures as representative nationally, this too will effect countries adjacent to the UK…”
29 April 2013
Published by nuclear-news.net
By Arclight2011
In this article I realise that I am touching on a sensitive subject and one that has impacted many. I hope to treat this subject with a respectful degree of gravitas. But I have some points to note.
“In women lead poisoning can cause stillbirth, miscarriage, premature birth and foetal development problems”
In my research of all things nuclear via the World Wide Web, I came across a set of shocking statistics that were unearthed by another independent researcher on You-tube video (jamnoise72).
UK Increase in
miscarriage rates due to MOX nuclear fuels policy change! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zha9qoMPYT0
That video shows the figures of miscarriages from Watford Hospital
London UK, showed an increase in the cases found. These figures from the hospital
came with a year on year (more or less) increase in respiratory admissions to
ICU accident and emergency admissions. here is the video for that!
……
“Miscarriage statistics aren’t
well-publicized. Miscarriage would be much easier if a weight of silence did
not hang over the topic. Miscarriage remains an uncomfortable subject in our
society. The silence permeating the topic causes more psychological pain for
the grieving mother since she is unable to mourn openly and properly.“
But apparently at
least 50 percent of all miscarriages are from “unknown causes” and the other common causes/factors have steady proportions. The
total amounts are reported in the medical and miscarriage support blogs as
being at a steady rate with no particular increase or decrease because they are
only a statistical average and not based on the actual numbers!…………“This issue is complicated in humans by the high natural spontaneous abortion rate of 15-30%, which makes determining the specific reproductive effects in humans difficult without studying large groups. “
So why don’t they collect the data nationally? Using the expensive computer system they have? Is it because they don’t want the actual numbers, because they have a blind faith in statistics? This is huge problem found in many areas of science and research. For instance, the Japanese study on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in dogs from the Fukushima Nuclear Accident that was commissioned. At the same time when the Japanese Thyroid Association was doing NO research on the impact of the nuclear disaster on humans.
Aomori doctors made this
poster showing radiological/toxic damage 28 years ago. Image source ; http://twitpic.com/b13a1j
Meanwhile somewhere in Japan a genetics laboratory staff are still awaiting even a single blood sample from the Fukushima residents so they can test for ionizing radiation damage (there is a test for this type of damage but it is not being used!).
“Births, terminations and stillbirths are
recorded by law, but the birth of a child before 24 weeks may not be because it
is called a miscarriage and there is simply no official audit of miscarriages.”
The Japanese government on year 2 of the disaster are just commissioning
a report on the ethics of using genetic research and the time is running out
for these tests to be accurate. This shows how science can be manipulated
avoiding real numbers for corporate profits. The science community relies
instead on the likes of Ricahrd Wakeford (ex BNFL Sellafield) and his handy
statistical equations.So why did I draw your attention to Japan? The UK is complicit in covering up the effects of ionizing radiation. The world science community relies on UK scientists to make their biased claims via peer reviewed article (70 percent of which are likely faulty reports in some way according to a recent stunning report) and the vast media presence of the BBC. This criminal use of science media and politics is responsible for the cover up on the effects on the people living in contaminated areas in Japan.
“We
postulate that chronic low-level ecological and professional ionizing radiation
exposure were causal for haemostasiological imbalance and impaired the
cell-cell communication”
Why does the UK and the USA want to increase the amount of
allowable contamination into our environment? Is it because our background
radiation and more relevantly, our air quality has been polluted with the
increased atmospheric emission coming from the new MOX fuel and waste disposal
of nuclear materials, nuclear reactor emissions, weapons discharges and
uranium/gold mining processes? And this is spreading micro-particles with ionizing
and toxic effects!This is a short article of my impression of my findings. I wanted to share these thoughts with you all and ask the questions. Now its up to you to do some research and ask your own questions. Military and governmental research accounts for a large proportion of a universities income.. there is little independent research allowed or funded for. Can we trust our scientists? Do they work for us or for corporate profits? You decide?
No comments:
Post a Comment